[enh] boardcasts logs

models.py

@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ class Job(peewee.Model):
         ('failure', 'Failure'),
     ), default="scheduled")
 
+    log = peewee.TextField(default="")
+
     created_time = peewee.DateTimeField(constraints=[peewee.SQL("DEFAULT (datetime('now'))")])
     started_time = peewee.DateTimeField(null=True)
     end_time = peewee.DateTimeField(null=True)

run.py

@@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ async def jobs_dispatcher():
 
 async def run_job(worker, job):
     await broadcast({
-            "action": "job",
+            "action": "update_job",
             "data": model_to_dict(job),
-        }, "jobs")
+        }, ["jobs", f"job-{job.id}"])
 
     # fake stupid command, whould run CI instead
     print(f"Starting job {job.name}...")
@@ -128,6 +128,19 @@ async def run_job(worker, job):
     while not command.stdout.at_eof():
         data = await command.stdout.readline()
         line = data.decode().rstrip()
+
+        job.log += data.decode()
+        # XXX seems to be okay performance wise but that's probably going to be
+        # a bottleneck at some point :/
+        # theoritically jobs are going to have slow output
+        job.save()
+
+        await broadcast({
+                "action": "update_job",
+                "id": job.id,
+                "data": model_to_dict(job),
+            }, ["jobs", f"job-{job.id}"])
+
         print(f">> {line}")
 
     # XXX stupid crap to stimulate long jobs
@@ -147,10 +160,14 @@ async def run_job(worker, job):
             "action": "update_job",
             "id": job.id,
             "data": model_to_dict(job),
-        }, "jobs")
+        }, ["jobs", f"job-{job.id}"])
 
 
-async def broadcast(message, channel):
+async def broadcast(message, channels):
+    if not isinstance(channels, (list, tuple)):
+        channels = [channels]
+
+    for channel in channels:
         ws_list = subscriptions[channel]
         dead_ws = []